Define the unit
Agree what enters the pilot, what a batch means and which fields are essential before the first hand-off.
EU / pilot briefCommunity ↗ēkotrace is testing whether material intelligence can travel with a textile from collection to sorting, processing and reporting — as a reviewable record, not a campaign claim.
One evidence thread across
collection → sort → process → report
It needs practical infrastructure for the moment when a material claim is questioned.
Our Netherlands-first thesis is deliberately narrow: take one defined textile stream through four operational gates, record the decisions and hand-offs, then invite a human review of what the record can and cannot support.
That is the work. No invented network, no implied endorsement, no leap from “designed for” to “certified against”.
Agree what enters the pilot, what a batch means and which fields are essential before the first hand-off.
Carry identity, mass balance, decision points and exceptions forward without pretending uncertainty is gone.
Leave with an evidence pack that a partner, buyer or reviewer can interrogate and improve.
Material, roles, consent and minimum evidence fields.
Capture collection, sorting and processing events in a shared review surface.
Test gaps, exceptions, mass balance and the language of uncertainty.
Review a bounded evidence pack and decide what earns a next phase.
01One agreed material scope has a documented chain across all four gates.
02At least 90% of pilot batches have complete minimum fields, with exceptions visible rather than filled in.
03Two partner-side reviewers can reproduce the material journey from the evidence pack.
04The group agrees a next-step decision: extend, change scope, pause or stop.
These official European Commission pages shape our questions about product information and interoperability. They do not certify ēkotrace or the pilot.
The pilot needs people who hold a real step in the material journey. We name capabilities publicly; relationships are confirmed separately and in writing.
Capture intake, origin, weight and hand-off evidence at the first gate.
Make decisions, grades, losses and outbound movements reviewable.
Return process, yield and destination evidence without exposing commercial detail.
Bring the question, material stream and reporting audience.
Challenge assumptions, define safeguards and review the pilot record.
Tell us which gate you hold and what a useful review would look like. An expression of interest is not a partnership commitment.